UREVO SpaceWalk vs CyberPad
The short answer
Buy the SpaceWalk 5L unless you want incline. It is the only UREVO here whose motor label I have read: 735W, S1 continuous duty, 0.99 CHP, in a 50.7 lb body that costs less than the CyberPad Office. The Office answers a different question. It gives you 14% powered incline against the SpaceWalk line's 9%, a claimed 30 dB against 40, and the smallest footprint of the three, on a motor whose 550W comes from a manual and has never been verified in hand. Skip the SpaceWalk 3S: it is brushed, 71 lb, and superseded by the 5L.
Specs side by side
 Urevo SpaceWalk 5L Check price |  Urevo 3S Check price |  Urevo CyberPad Office Check price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (US) | $289.99 | $269.99 | $499.99 |
| Motor | 735W / 0.99 CHP / 2.5 HP peak | 600W / 0.8 CHP / 2.5 HP peak | 550W / 0.74 CHP / 2.5 HP peak |
| Motor type | Brushless - our inference, not a vendor claim | Brushed | Brushless - listed in manual / tech details |
| Auto incline | 9% (auto) | 9% (auto) | 14% (auto) |
| Belt (L x W) | 39.4" x 15.8" | 42.5" x 16.9" | 39.4" x 16.5" |
| Max user weight | 300 lb | 265 lb | 242 lb |
| Max speed | 4 mph | 4 mph | 4 mph |
| Noise | 40 dB | 46 dB | 30 dB |
| Height | 6.1" | 6.5" | 6" |
| Footprint (L x W) | 48.8" x 20.3" | 51.6" x 22.1" | 43" x 23" |
| Unit weight | 50.7 lb | 71 lb | 63 lb |
| Shock absorption | Yes | Yes | Yes (8/10) |
| App | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty | 18 mo | 18 mo | 18 mo |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 (2144 ratings) | 4.3 / 5 (905 ratings) | 4.3 / 5 (1398 ratings) |
UREVO runs two walking pad lines at once and does not explain the difference anywhere. SpaceWalk is the older, taller, cheaper family. CyberPad is the slim desk family. The confusing part is that the cheaper line has the stronger motor.
The one motor label I have actually read
The SpaceWalk 5L is the only UREVO in this comparison whose motor I have physically seen. Label RT-076133: 735W, S1 continuous duty, 3000 RPM, Class F, 310 VDC, serial M1RTJ30500901. That works out to 0.99 CHP.
The CyberPad Office has never been opened. Its 550W comes from one document, the EU manual URTM051 V2.0, and 550/746 is 0.74 CHP. So on the numbers I can check, the SpaceWalk 5L sustains a third more power than the CyberPad Office and costs less.
There is a caveat I keep attached to that gap, because it may not be real. The 5L's own EU manual, URTM054, also said 550W. The label said 735W. Both pads are marketed as dual brushless at 2.5 HP peak, both are built by Shenzhen Yile Dynamic Technology, and the Office's 550W may be exactly the same understated rated figure. Until someone opens one, the table stays at 0.74 and I will not price the Office as if it were 735W.
What the CyberPad buys you instead
Two things, and both are about the desk rather than the motor.
Height. The CyberPad Office is 6 inches tall against the 5L's 6.1 and the SpaceWalk 3S's 6.5. That is a small gap in this trio, but the CyberPad is also 43 by 23 inches against the 3S's 51.6 by 22.1, which is nearly nine inches less floor.
Incline. The CyberPad Office does 14% auto incline in 14 powered levels. Both SpaceWalks stop at 9%. If you want grade rather than power, there is no argument here: the SpaceWalk line does not offer it.
The Office also claims 30 dB against the 5L's 40 and the 3S's 46, and it is the only one of the three the SmartCoach app can drive without a remote.
SpaceWalk 3S or SpaceWalk 5L
This is the easier half of the question, and the answer is not close.
The 3S is a brushed pad. Nothing in its manual, URTM024 V1.0, or on UREVO's product page has ever claimed otherwise, and its 600W rated power is 0.80 CHP. It is also 71 lb against the 5L's 50.7, taller at 6.5 inches, noisier at 46 dB, and rated to 265 lb of user against 300.
What the 3S still has is a bigger belt, 42.5 by 16.9 inches against the 5L's 39.4 by 15.8, and a lower price. That is the whole case for it, and UREVO's own catalog treats the 5L as its successor.
Two ownership notes on the 3S that no listing mentions. It has no rubber stops on the head end, so standing it head-down against a wall breaks the power switch, and its rails sit high enough that lubricating it means fishing your fingers under the belt.
What to actually buy
- You want the strongest motor for the money: the SpaceWalk 5L. Verified 735W, 0.99 CHP, 50.7 lb, and cheaper than the CyberPad Office.
- You want incline, quiet, or the smallest footprint: the CyberPad Office. 14% powered grade, 30 dB claimed, 43 by 23 inches.
- You want the 5L and it is out of budget: wait for a sale rather than dropping to the SpaceWalk 3S. The 3S is a brushed motor in a heavier body, and the price gap is smaller than the durability gap.
If you are choosing between the two CyberPads rather than between the lines, that is a different question and it has its own page: CyberPad Home vs Office.
One thing applying to all three: as of 2026-03-20 UREVO's direct warranty is 1 year plus a 180-day extension, and the extension only applies if you install the UREVO app and register the device by serial number within the window. Do it on day one.
FAQ
What is the difference between the UREVO SpaceWalk and the UREVO CyberPad?
SpaceWalk is the older, taller, cheaper line and CyberPad is the slim desk line, but the split is not what the names suggest. The SpaceWalk 5L carries the strongest verified motor UREVO sells, 735W and 0.99 CHP off its physical label. The CyberPads top out at a manual-stated 550W, 0.74 CHP, and both claim a lower noise floor. Only the CyberPad Office buys you more grade: 14% powered incline, where the Home and both SpaceWalks stop at 9%.
Is the UREVO SpaceWalk 5L worth it over the SpaceWalk 3S?
Yes, and it is not close. The 3S is brushed at 600W, which is 0.80 CHP, weighs 71 lb, runs at 46 dB and takes 265 lb of user. The 5L is brushless at a label-verified 735W, 0.99 CHP, 50.7 lb, 40 dB and 300 lb. The 3S keeps a bigger belt, 42.5 by 16.9 inches against the 5L's 39.4 by 15.8, and a lower price. UREVO's own catalog treats the 5L as its replacement.
Does the UREVO SpaceWalk 3S have a brushless motor?
No, and UREVO has never said it does. The URTM024 V1.0 manual, the Amazon listing and the brand product page all describe a 2.5 HP peak motor with no brushless qualifier anywhere, and the manual's 600W rated power gives 0.80 CHP. The brushless ads that appear on its Amazon page belong to a different ASIN.
Which UREVO walking pad is the quietest?
By published figures the two CyberPads tie at a claimed 30 dB, then the SpaceWalk 5L Fold iMix at 35, the SpaceWalk 5L at 40 and the SpaceWalk 3S at 46. None of these are measured by me and none cite a method, so treat the ranking as real and the absolute numbers as marketing. The pattern behind it is genuine: the brushed 3S is the loud one. CyberPad Home vs Office